18th ICDE World Conference

Pre-Conference Workshop

Distance Education and National Development:

Research Perspectives

Presented in partnership by:

The American Centre for the Study of Distance Education

and

The World Bank

29-31 May, 1997

Penn State University,

Pennsylvania,

U.S.A.



TECHNOLOGY,

DISTANCE EDUCATION

AND

NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Dr. A.W.Bates,

Director,

Distance Education and Technology,

Continuing Studies,

The University of British Columbia,

2329 West Mall,

Vancouver, B.C.,

Canada V6T 1Z4

Tel: 1-604-822-1646

Fax: 1-604-822-0822

e-mail: tony.bates@ubc.ca

http://bates.cstudies.ubc.ca

© The University of British Columbia, 1997

Introduction

New information technologies are seen as the major driving force of the future economies of countries around the world. In particular these technologies are seen as both destroyers and creators of jobs: they destroy jobs by replacing labour with machines, and they create jobs in new industries, such as telecommunications, software development, software applications, and in service industries built around the new information technologies, such as financial services, entertainment, and increasingly education and training.

Another feature of the new economies is that they are global, and increasingly the best paid jobs require workers who are mobile, and can work on a global basis. Global trade though requires educational providers to prepare their students for globalization. Increased migration and immigration, and the increasing globalization of work and leisure activities, require a better understanding of multi-cultural issues. Lastly, access to specialized knowledge is becoming critical for economic, political and social reasons.

All this means, among other things, that educational providers need to prepare their students for living and working in a global, multi-ethnic and highly mobile environment.

Furthermore, the new technologies offer the promise of increased educational effectiveness, by widening access, improving the quality of learning by making it relevant to the skills and knowledge needed in an information society, and by improving the cost effectiveness of education, enabling more people to be educated to similar or higher standards for the same dollar investment.

This paper attempts to explore these issues in more detail, and in particular examines the impact of the increasing globalization of education through the use of new technologies, its importance for national development, and areas where research is needed to guide policy and practice.

The Promise

New computer and telecommunications technologies, and in particular satellites, wireless technology, telecommunications and computing, offer the possibilities of open access to education. Students can now, in terms of technology, access any course they want, at any time, from anywhere in the world.

This in turn offers the possibility of a truly global classroom, unlimited by race, religion or nationality, with multi-ethnic courses, students and teachers. Teachers and students can be drawn from many countries, and study the same course together at the same time.

For researchers, there is increasing universal on-line access to journals, libraries and other academic resources, and more importantly on-line technologies facilitate the global networking of research.

Perhaps most important of all, the new information technologies offer the potential to empower individual learners, to enable education to be learner centred, focused on the needs and demands of learners, rather than those of the providers of education, and to encourage the development of higher order learning skills, such as critical thinking, knowledge construction, and collaborative learning.

The promise: three examples

I offer three examples from my own institution of how the promise is becoming reality. Many more examples could be found both within my own institution, and also from many other institutions.

Educating teachers to use new information technologies

Monterrey Institute of Technology (ITESM), and the University of British Columbia (UBC), have entered into a partnership agreement for the development and delivery of five courses in technology-based distributed learning, both in Canada and in Mexico. The courses will form part of ITESM's Masters in Educational Technology, and will be available, subject to academic approval at UBC, within UBC's Faculty of Education's masters program. The five courses will also be available in Canada as a graduate certificate program, for those that do not wish to take a full masters program. Individual courses within a program will also be available to learners in Canada. The first course, on the design, development and delivery of technology-based delivery, opens in September (1997).

The courses will be delivered using a mix of set-books, the World Wide Web, and compressed video-conferencing/satellite distribution. ITESM has 26 campuses across Mexico, and one in Colombia, linked by satellite and the Internet. Over 200 students and over 100 faculty will take the Masters program in ITESM, and UBC will offer the course in Canada to approximately 15 graduate students and over 30 non-credit students.

The design uses a cascade system of tutoring. There will be four tutorial groups in Mexico, with tutors appointed by ITESM, and one or two groups in Canada, with a tutor appointed by UBC. Tutorials will be Web-based, using Web discussion group software. The ITESM tutors will be bi-lingual. As well as the five individual tutorial groups, there will be a common, international discussion group in English. ITESM tutors, and any students from Mexico or Canada, who wish to post comments in English, will be able to do so in the common forum. There will also be a private discussion group for tutors and instructors on the course.

ITESM and UBC are sharing the cost of development. The program will be self-financing from fees. The cascade model of tutoring enables the course to be extended to other institutions/countries at minimum cost. ITESM will have all rights for program delivery in all Spanish speaking countries and UBC will have world rights elsewhere.

This agreement is the first of what will be many between ITESM and UBC, which will include exchange of students and faculty, as well as delivery of courses at a distance. Both parties see this partnership in terms of strategic positioning. UBC has excellent networks, contacts and contracts in Asian countries; ITESM is strong in Latin America. As well as sharing costs and gaining international experience and networking in each other's country, the partnership widens substantially access to two key world economic regions for each institution.

SEARCA: collaboration in agricultural sciences

A consortium of agricultural universities/faculties consisting of the Universiti Putra, Malaysia, Kaesartsat University, Thailand, the University of the Philippines at Los Baños, with UBC and the University of Queensland, Australia, as associate partners, has been established, to promote joint course development and collaboration, and exchange of students and faculties.

As part of this consortium, UBC and Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) are entering into an agreement for the development and delivery of a distance education program, whereby UPM will provide programs on tropical agriculture and UBC programs on temperate agriculture. Students at UPM will take their programs either face-to-face or in distance education format, and UBC programs at a distance; UBC students will take UBC programs either face-to-face or at a distance, and UPM programs at a distance. In some cases, an individual course will be jointly developed; in others, one institution will take responsibility for a course delivered into the other. If this model is successful, it will be extended throughout the consortium. As well as course development, UBC will be assisting UPM to strengthen its distance education unit's capacity in the use of technology for course delivery.

Post-graduate architecture

Several universities, including UBC, MIT, Hong Kong University, the University of Sydney, and the University of Washington, have been collaborating for several years in post-graduate education over the World Wide Web. Research students in each university post up ideas, questions and suggestions for each other's work. In particular, students post up their design exercises for comments by students in other universities. More recently, students in different universities have been working collaboratively on design projects. The University of Washington is developing virtual reality software that can be run over the Web, so students and instructors can get a three-dimensional view of project design.

Different models of international technology-based distance delivery

These case-studies illustrate that a number of different models of international technology-based distance delivery are emerging.

1. Direct delivery to individuals in another country

This is perhaps the most common form of international delivery of distance education, and has been going on for many years. I call this the 'sales'model of international education: a foreign institution sells its courses directly to individuals in another country. Both the British Open University and several Australian universities have been particularly active in this market. It has the advantage of being market driven and brings in extra revenue for the originating institution.

However there are a great many difficulties and problems with this approach. In more recent years, the Open University in Britain has been very successful with its MBA program overseas, particularly in Eastern Europe, but there are special circumstances there. Given its size, experience, and the range and quality of its materials, the British Open University has had surprisingly little success over the years with the direct marketing model. Despite several attempts, its impact on the North American market has been neglible, and even in developing countries, it has been much more successful in consultancy and sales of materials to other institutions than in the direct marketing of materials to individuals.

There are several reasons why this is a difficult model to make work. First of all, there is the issue of marketing. Either one has to use agents or establish a very expensive marketing network. Accreditation is also an issue. Many overseas students prefer, rightly or wrongly, accreditation from more prestigious, conventional universities than from dedicated open universities. Few dual mode institutions have full degree programs available entirely at a distance, and admission to programs may be problematic for foreign students for 'prestigious'universities overseas, even at a distance. Transfer of credits from a foreign institution is a particular problem.

Secondly, access to technology for individual students wanting to access courses from an overseas provider is still an acute problem in most countries, even in countries such as Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. Many students in these countries do not have their own computer or Internet access, or the software or standards required by the overseas provider. A related issue is cost. Foreign students are frankly often seen as a cash cow, and are therefore charged not only the full cost but also a margin for profit. The costs of delivery internationally are in any case higher, with shipping and long-distance costs.

Thirdly, local student support is critical. It is not just a question of tutorials, which can be done well remotely. It is the issue of motivation, counselling, and the application of the material to local circumstances. Without a local partner, local student support is very difficult to provide.

The biggest barrier though is content, in the form of language, relevancy and cultural issues. Studying at a distance is difficult enough. Studying in a second or sometimes third language, especially where there is a great deal of printed material, is even more difficult. Translation costs are high, and getting good quality translations is not easy. In many cases the materials have been developed for a different type of learner, with different cultural assumptions, levels of prior experience, and experience in learning. Materials may use case studies, examples and forms of language that are unknown in another country. In particular, foreign students may not have been exposed to constructivist forms of teaching and learning, or may have had even less experience in independent study methods.

Lastly, there is the question of the ethics of marketing to individuals. The Commonwealth of Learning has become so concerned about the activities of some distance learning institutions in their overseas marketing that it has developed a code of ethics for international marketing, and a 'buyers'guide for potential students. For all these reasons, I have tried to avoid direct marketing of our courses outside British Columbia.

Given the challenges of this model, it is not surprising that in recent years a number of other approaches have been developed, mainly based on the idea of partnership.

2. Inter-institutional direct delivery from one country to another

In this model, an institution in one country sells its materials to another institution in a foreign country, which then adapts and incorporates the materials as its own. This is sometimes known as a franchise model; instead of a fixed price for the purchase of rights and/or materials, the local institution may pay a head 'tax'on every student enrolled.

This model has the advantage of getting courses up and running much more cheaply than developing them in house, the courses can be more easily adapted to local culture and markets, and accreditation and student support is the responsibility of the local institution.

Even this model though has its problems. One reason why the British Open University has so much difficulty in the North American market is that there are fundamental differences in the length of degree programs (three year undergraduate degrees in the UK compared with four years in North America, for instance), and in the length of courses (32 weeks for a full credit, 16 for a half credit, compared with 13 week semesters in North America).

Secondly, everyone wants to export (sell) and nobody wants to import (buy) in distance education. There are several reasons for this. The main one is faculty control over the curriculum. Buying in courses from elsewhere threatens to make existing faculty redundant. Also the teaching approach is often not acceptable to the academics who have to approve the program, because, for instance, it may not provide the necessary pre-requisites for subsequent courses.

Thirdly curriculum is usually supply rather than demand driven, in the sense that it reflects what faculty want to teach, rather than the needs of students in the country buying the courses.

Fourthly, even between countries as culturally similar as Canada and the United States, there are still some major cultural difficulties in language, assumptions and examples that need to be overcome. The greater the cultural difference between countries, the greater the problem this becomes.

Lastly, although it is usually much cheaper to buy in than develop original materials, financial arrangements may militate against this. Since academics are already on the pay-roll, bought-in courses tend to be additional programs for students, and need extra cash up front (even though they may bring in revenues later). This cash may not be available, and even if it is, in some cases students may merely move from existing, campus-based courses to the new DE courses.

Despite these difficulties, there is still a great deal of scope for the franchising of courses. We are looking at bringing in courses at the EMBA level, for inter-disciplinary areas (such as environmental studies), and particularly in non-credit areas, such as certificate and diploma programs, or individual modules, such as CD-ROM's, aimed at particular target groups, such as workplace training, where we can meet new markets that are not being served by UBC (or other institutions in our region) at the moment.

3. Joint partnership between institutions in different countries

This model has already been exemplified by the case-studies discussed previously. In these partnerships, courses are jointly planned between institutions, and each plays a significant role in either the development or delivery of programs, or both. It is hoped in this way to achieve truly multi-cultural approaches to course design, and to avoid many of the other problems associated with the previous two models.

Requirements for international partnerships

These new partnerships are proliferating in many different forms, and between many different organizations, speeded up by the use of new technologies which know no international boundaries.

Experience suggests a number of lessons have already been learned about what makes for successful partnerships:

New teaching models

The combination of new technologies and new partnership arrangements will lead to the development of new models of teaching and learning.

For instance, the British Open University's Knowledge Media Institute has launched a number of international 'events'over the Internet, using video and audio as well as text, under what it calls the 'virtual stadium'. These are presentations by some of the most distinguished academics in their field delivered on a global basis, with opportunities for interaction and discussion over the Internet.

As well as whole courses, we have been involved in the delivery of 'guest'lectures from staff at UBC into courses offered by ITESM in Mexico through video-conferencing. We have been able to offer a course in Plant Science to UBC students by sharing a lecturer and a course being offered by the University College of the Fraser Valley, again by video-conferencing.

Gene Rubin at the University of Maryland in the USA and Ulli Bernath at the University of Oldenberg in Germany went further and offered a whole thirteen week seminar on the World Wide Web through the use of guest lecturers from around the world. Each week a guest lecturer posted one or two readings for the students, who were mainly based at Maryland or Oldenberg, but who also included students from Australia, Canada, and Eastern European countries. The readings were accompanied by a week's discussion on-line between the students and with the guest lecturer. We plan to use up to three guest lecturers on each of our courses with ITESM.

We are also seeing an increasing number of virtual conferences. Anne Forster and colleagues at the University of New South Wales organized a world-wide on-line conference, using a list serve, in parallel with the Telelearning'96 conference; Terry Anderson at the University of Alberta in Canada did the same for the ICDE conference in 1995. Both these virtual conferences enabled those unable to attend the 'real'conferences to participate in some way.

Another development will be the growth of international mixed-mode courses, combining residence in a foreign country with preparation and follow-up at a distance in one's own country, in most cases using a combination of the Internet and printed materials.

These are just a few examples of new teaching models that are developing for international education.

The reality for developing countries

Most of these developments are taking place in relatively wealthy countries. The reality is that information-technology based distance education depends on a well developed national information technology infrastructure consisting of:

These are challenging requirements even for most developed countries. Even in Canada, there are relatively few school classrooms that can meet these standards.

There is therefore a widening gap between the rich and poor in terms of access to communications technologies, and a widening gap between rich and poor nations. In many ways the greatest disparity is not between countries but within countries. For instance wealthy elites in even the poorest countries can communicate globally with each other much more easily than they can with people in the barriadas and ghettoes of their own cities. Johannesburg is better connected to London than it is to Soweto.

Nelson Mandela (1995) has highlighted the serious consequences of this trend for developing countries:

'The present reality is that the technology gap between developed and developing nations is actually widening...most of the developing world has no experience of what readily accessible communications can do for their society and their economy'.

Morris Miller (1996) argues that in developing countries:

'work must be found outside the rural sector...the young generation in rural communities need to acquire competence in the use of modern technology of the information age...preparing young rural people to work in the world outside the farm is vital if they are to be employable in the service and manufacturing industries that are located in towns and large urban centres.'

As Miller recognizes, for this to happen, information technologies have to be brought to the rural villages. How then can this be done?

There are at least three strategies that can be used. First of all, the traditional 'mass media', 'second generation' form of distance education, based on centralised production of materials, use of mass media such as broadcasting, television and radio, and economies of scale through delivery to very large numbers, has been very successful in countries where it has been professionally applied, such as at the Sukhothaithammithirat Open University in Thailand, the Korean National Open University, the Alama Iqbal Open University in Pakistan, and the Indira Gandhi National Open University in India. For those countries wishing to educate very large numbers of relatively poor people, mass media are still more appropriate technologies than the new information technologies.

A second strategy is to develop low-cost alternatives to or rather variations on new information technologies that are appropriate to the current level of development of a particular country. One way of doing this is to by-pass the energy and terrestrial-based telecommunications networks that have not yet reached into villages. Miller suggests for instance the development of grid-free village level energy sources that can provide local power sources, not just for cooking and heating (thereby saving precious wood), but also for education and training purposes.

With local sources of energy, students can use computers and CD-ROM technology for their learning. Networking and hence tutoring and contact with other students outside the village can be provided by low-cost wireless technologies and low orbiting satellites. Low orbiting satellites cost in the order of 100 times less than geo-stationary satellites. They can provide a basic call and forward data communciations system. They cover most areas of the world between four to six times a day, collecting messages beamed up by short-wave radios connected to computers, and delivering messages the same way, through the use of coded references to messages: only the receivers corresponding to the codes on the messages can de-encrypt the message. The radio system for this costs in the order of hundreds of dollars.

The third strategy is not to ignore the privileged elite in developing countries, but to include them in the process. Most of the prestigious universities as well as most leading businesses have relatively good Internet and international telecommunications links, even in the poorest countries. For these organizations, a high-tech technology hub can be created in each major centre, providing two-way satellite communications, high-speed international telecommunications links, multimedia workstations and labs, and high-speed Internet services. These can become centres of excellence for the development of new education and training services for the admittedly elite sections of the country. These centres can link to other regional centres, and can be used to provide training for the industrial and business sectors within their own communities. The importance of such hi-tech centres of excellence is that they could provide the elite within each country with the knowledge and skills needed to ensure their country does not fall behind, and to emphasise to key decision-makers the importance of investment in such technologies for the development of their own country.

None of these strategies diminishes the need for government and private sector investment in the development of national telecommunications networks reaching into every town and village within a country. However, this may take many years - if ever - to accomplish, and in the meantime some intermediate strategies are needed to bring new technologies quickly into use for education and training in all developing countries, and especially in rural and ghetto areas of cities.

The importance of government policies and regulation

The challenge for governments is to find the right balance between private sector investment and competition in telecommunications, and the need for equity in access. In the past nationalization or state ownership has been the main means of regulation and equity in access to telecommunications services. There are though alternative routes to public ownership that can allow competition and freedom for the private sector while at the same time encouraging equity of access to telecommunications services.

For instance a number of state higher education systems in the United States of America have set up their own private networks through the lease of lines and services from private sector telecommunications companies. In British Columbia the provincial government is establishing a Provincial Learning Network that will link up all government offices, universities, hospitals, colleges and schools. One of the key criteria for the award of any contract is that all rural schools will be provided with a minimum level of Internet and telecommunications services. In essence the government is using its bulk purchasing power to leverage services and a reduced level of costs from telecommunications providers (it can only do this if there is genuine competition between telecommunications carriers).

Research questions

What we are witnessing is a chaotic but rapidly expanding sector of international distance education using advanced telecommunications and computing technologies. Educational institutions and governments are having to address as a result new problems and challenges with little in the way of established practice or experience to guide them. There is then an urgent need for research in the area of the international delivery of distance education through the use of new information technologies. This paper has identified a number of areas where such research would be particularly valuable.

What the hell is going on here?

First of all a general survey of some of the developments in this area would be extremely valuable. Different models are being developed; new arrangements are being made; new partnerships are being formed. Most information in this area is anectdotal, and many people who are entering this field are totally unaware of what others are doing. A study that provides a clear and objective description of a significant number of cases where new information technologies are being used for the international delivery of courses would of itself provide an immensely useful document. This in turn would help to define more precisely the key areas needing further research.

Partnership arrangements

Secondly it is clear that many institutions are now looking to partnership, collaboration and even consortia to provide international delivery of courses through telecommunications technologies. What are the requirements for succesful partnerships? What kind of partnerships seem to be succesful, and which seem to fail?

The response of learners

How do learners in different countries and in different sectors within a country respond to international courses delivered through telecommunications? What are the key cultural and language issues that need to be addressed in such programs? What kinds of students benefit most from such courses? Do such courses narrow or widen the gap between the rich and poor?

Ethical issues and student services

What protection do potential students need when courses are delivered from out of their local jurisdiction? What standards or policies should providers of international education adhere to? What if any regulatory policies are needed to protect learners?

Teaching models

What teaching approaches seem to work best in international delivery of courses via networks? What new models are being developed? How successful are they?

Appropriate technologies for the poor and developing countries

Is it possible to develop low-cost, alternative technologies that provide the same or better educational benefits than mainstream information technologies for low income groups or people in rural areas? How can such technologies be financed so that they are sustainable?

Government policies

What strategies can governments employ to develop and support an information technology infrastructure that widens access to information technology based distance education?

These questions need to be refined and further developed, but it is clear that the international delivery of courses via new information technologies provides a rich source for research and investigation.

However, it is already clear that this sector will continue to expand exponentially, and without some form of systematic research, it will become increasingly chaotic and high risk.

References

Mandela, N. (1995) 'A deadline for the poor: nations'technological divide expanding'International Herald Tribune October 10th

Miller, M. (1996) 'An international program for poverty alleviation: a key element of a global security agenda'The Development Aspect of an Integrated Agenda for Global Security Toronto: Pugwash Seminar, 19 September.